<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">52</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="short-title">gesr</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.31703/gesr</journal-id>
  <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Global Educational Studies Review</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">gesr</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group>
  <issn publication-format="print">2708-2113</issn>
  <issn publication-format="electronic">2708-3608</issn>
  <self-uri xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com"/>
  <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Humanity Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Pakistan</publisher-loc>
  </publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
  <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">394358</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-I).43</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="other" specific-use="submission-id">4827</article-id>
  <article-version article-version-type="publisher">1.0</article-version>
  <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
      <subject>article</subject>
    </subj-group>
  </article-categories>
  <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">Factors Affecting Teachers&apos; Turnover Intention: A Study of Cadet Colleges in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa</article-title>
  </title-group>
<contrib-group>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="1" corresp="yes">
    <name>
      <surname>Khan</surname>
      <given-names>Farid Ullah</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="2">
    <name>
      <surname>Khan</surname>
      <given-names>Munir</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="3">
    <name>
      <surname>Naseer Ud Din</surname>
      <given-names>Muhammad</given-names>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
  </contrib>
  <aff id="aff1">
    <label>1</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Education and Psychology, Kohat University of Science &amp; Technology, Kohat</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff2">
    <label>2</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Education, University of Malakand, Chakdara</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Assistant Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff3">
    <label>3</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Department of Education and Psychology, Kohat University of Science &amp; Technology, Kohat</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">Professor</named-content>
    <addr-line>KP</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
  <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding Author: Farid Ullah Khan, Assistant Professor, Department of Education and Psychology, Kohat University of Science &amp; Technology, Kohat, KP, Pakistan.</corresp>
<fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="fn-coi">
  <p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="ethics-statement" id="fn-ethics">
  <p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="data-availability-statement" id="fn-data">
  <p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
  <day>31</day>
  <month>03</month>
  <year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
  <month>03</month>
  <year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print">
  <day>02</day>
  <month>06</month>
  <year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
  <volume>6</volume>
  <issue>1</issue>
  <season>Winter</season>
  <fpage>425</fpage>
  <lpage>436</lpage>
  <history>
    <date date-type="accepted">
      <day>02</day>
      <month>06</month>
      <year>2022</year>
    </date>
  </history>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>
<p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p>
  </funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<permissions>
  <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
  <copyright-holder>Humanity Publications</copyright-holder>
  <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
  </license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com/article/factors-affecting-teachers-turnover-intention-a-study-of-cadet-colleges-in-khyber-pakhtunkhwa"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com/pdf/gesr/XcMdDMIIrT.pdf"/>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com/pdf/gesr/XcMdDMIIrT.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  <abstract>
    <p>This study investigated the effects of financial, managerial, job satisfaction, job stress, individual, and family factors on the turnover intention of teachers in cadet colleges in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The study&apos;s nature is quantitative, using a survey questionnaire to collect the perspectives of educators. The study utilised simple random sampling to choose a sample of 223 teachers. The study found that educators faced intricate challenges and were considering quitting their current job upon finding another opportunity. The study found a significant correlation between turnover intention and five factors: managerial, job satisfaction, job stress, individual, and family. The study&apos;s multiple linear regression analysis found significant correlations between teachers&apos; turnover intention in cadet colleges and their job satisfaction, job stress, and individual and family factors. The financial factor has a weak correlation and no significant influence on turnover intention. Cadet college administrators can use the study&apos;s findings to improve these criteria to prevent teacher turnover.</p>
  </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
  <kwd>Turnover Intention</kwd>
  <kwd>Financial Factor</kwd>
  <kwd>Managerial Factor</kwd>
  <kwd>Job Satisfaction</kwd>
  <kwd>Job Stress</kwd>
  <kwd>Individual Factor</kwd>
  <kwd>Family Factor</kwd>
  <kwd>Cadet College</kwd>
  <kwd>Khyber Pakhtunkhwa</kwd>
  <kwd>Teachers</kwd>
</kwd-group>
  <custom-meta-group>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>views</meta-name><meta-value>469</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>downloads</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>html-views</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>google-scholar-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>crossref-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
  </custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1">
  <title>Introduction</title>
<p>The term &quot;turnover&quot; is used to describe when workers leave a company. Turnover in the teaching profession is the frequency with which teachers quit their jobs and are replaced by others. It is influenced by several factors, including low salaries, limited professional growth opportunities, excessive workload, lack of support and recognition, challenging working conditions, and job dissatisfaction. These causes contribute to a cycle of turnover, resulting in negative consequences for both teachers and students, such as instability in classrooms, reduced continuity, and decreased instructional quality. When the employee makes the choice to leave, it is considered a voluntary termination, however, when the employer makes the choice, it is considered an involuntary termination. (Holtom, Mitchell, Lee, &amp; Eberly, 2008). Employees&apos; plans to leave might be affected by a wide range of factors. Employee retention is mostly determined by elements such as job satisfaction, work-life balance, trust, and management support, according to previous research.(Kim, Knutson, &amp; Choi, 2016). Staff turnover can be either voluntary or involuntaryDifferentiating between willing and unwilling employee turnover is crucial as observed by (Perez &amp; Mirabella, 2013) since otherwise, the evaluation of such a connection in terms of all leavers will be inaccurate. When an employee leaves voluntarily, we call that turnover. (Staw, 1980) claimed that voluntary departures incurred both direct and indirect costs, such as the need for replacement, increased stress for the remaining staff, and a reduction in social capital, as reported by Taylor and Cosenza (1998) distinguished between healthy and dysfunctional voluntary turnover. Poor performers leaving are considered functional turnover, while good workers leaving are considered dysfunctional. Employee turnover can be further classified as either avoidable (caused by factors like pay and working conditions) or uncontrollable (caused by life events such as family relocation, serious illness, or death).  When a worker is let go by the company, it is considered an involuntary turnover.</p><p>While actual turnover is hard to examine due to the difficulty of tracking down former employees, preventing voluntary departures is much more damaging to an organization. It&apos;s a major problem in Asia that has to be investigated using a wide range of factors. (Khatri, Fern, &amp; Budhwar, 2001). According to (Ladd &amp; Sorensen, 2017), teacher turnover is defined as the &quot;change in teachers from one year to the next in a specific school setting.&quot; In Pakistan, on average 60% turnover has been reported in private colleges and 40% among full-time faculty elsewhere (Sanderson &amp; Siegfried, 2003). Teachers who are considering leaving are less invested in the success of their students and their colleagues. When a teacher leaves, the remaining teachers are saddled with extra work because they must pick up the slack. Long-term exposure to it decreases dedication and increases the intention to leave (Shaw, Duffy, Johnson, &amp; Lockhart, 2005). Job satisfaction (Liu et al., 2020), teacher engagement (Schaufeli &amp; Bakker, 2004; Tvedt, Tommelein, Klakegg, &amp; Wong, 2023), teacher commitment (Esop &amp; Timms, 2019), teacher burnout (Schaufeli &amp; Bakker, 2004) and teacher efficacy (Li &amp; Yao, 2022),  are just some of the antecedents of teachers</p><p>Koh and Goh (1995) discovered that monetary benefits, the reputation of the firm, and satisfaction with future career prospects are all significant factors positively increasing turnover intention. Salary and other financial benefits have been shown to affect turnover intent in various research. (Ghiselli, La Lopa, &amp; Bai, 2001). Swailes and Al Fahdi (2011) argued that discontent with the company&apos;s management, pay structure, or possibilities for advancement increases the possibility that workers may choose to leave. Empowering employees to make their own decisions about mundane tasks while being held accountable for their outcomes is a tried-and-true management technique. Turnover could be controversial because instructors chose their profession. Over time, poor compensation, heavy workload, lack of time for self-improvement, inefficient reward systems, and an absence of professional growth all contribute to a high turnover rate among secondary school teachers. It is unknown how to address this issue. There appears to be a dearth of data regarding the factors that lead to teacher turnover in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa cadet colleges; hence, this investigation seeks to fill that knowledge gap.</p><p>The study is guided by the following broad research questions: (1) what is the relationship between the selected factors and turnover intention? (2) What are the factors that significantly influence the teacher’s turnover intention?</p><p>Keeping in view the various aspects of individual and family factors playing a crucial role in turnover intention, the following hypotheses are forwarded for empirical testing:</p><p>H1: A significant relationship exists between financial factors and turnover intention among teachers.</p><p>H2: A significant correlation exists between managerial factors and turnover intention.</p><p>H3: A significant correlation exists between job satisfaction and teacher turnover intention.</p><p>H4: A significant correlation exists between job stress and teacher turnover intention.</p><p>H5: A significant correlation will exist between individual factors and teacher turnover intention.</p><p>H6: A significant correlation will exist between familial factors and teachers&apos; turnover intentions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2">
  <title>Conceptual Framework of the Study</title>
<p>In order to determine the relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variable (turnover intention), six elements were chosen as independent variables (financial considerations, managerial factors, job satisfaction, job stress, individual factors, and family factors). The study&apos;s secondary objective was to identify the elements that have the greatest impact on turnover intent.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3">
  <title>Figure 1</title>
<p>Conceptual Framework</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<p>The survey research methodology was adopted to garner teachers&apos; perceptions from cadet colleges located in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan, to find a correlation between the dependent and independent variables. The participants were accessed through post and personal visits.</p><p><break/></p><p>Population and Sample of the Study</p><p>The study&apos;s population included all 10 cadet colleges in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and their 267 faculty members; the sample included 8 colleges and 223 faculty members. Expert statisticians recommend a sample size of N&gt;50+8.M for regression analysis, where M is the total number of independent variables (Sinniah &amp; Kamil, 2017). As per the formula, the minimum sample size should be N&gt;50+8(6) = 98 which is much higher than the minimum required one. This approach was adopted to lend credibility to the research findings.</p><p><break/></p><p>The Research Instrument</p><p>A modified 56-item (Shah, Fakhr, Ahmad, &amp; Zaman, 2010) questionnaire examined turnover intent. on a five-point Likert scale. The questionnaire&apos;s Cronbach alpha for inter-item consistency was 114, above the social sciences&apos; minimum acceptable value of 0.6 (Koul &amp; Fisher, 2006). Financial, managerial, job happiness, job stress, individual, and family aspects all have high Cronbach alpha values.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5">
  <title>Data Analysis and Interpretation</title>
<p>Pearson
correlation and linear regression were used to analyze the data in SPSS version
20. The range of the correlation coefficient was defined as follows: r =
0.01–0.29 = weak; r = 0.29–0.49 = moderate; r = 0.49–0.69 = strong.
Significant/Extremely High Correlation, r = 0.70 or Greater (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="file:///D:/Fulltext/GESR/2021/Winter/43%20Factors%20Affecting%20Teachers%20%20Turnover%20Intention%20-%20Farid%20ULLAH%20Khan.docx#Flammarion">Flammarion et al., 2002</ext-link>)</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Participants’ Demographic
Profile</p> <table-wrap id="table1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><title>Table 1</title></caption><table><thead><tr><th colspan="10"> <p><bold>Colleges and
   Teachers Participated in the Study</bold></p> </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td> <p><bold>College Name</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>College1</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>College2</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>College3</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>College4</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>College5</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>College6</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>College7</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>College8</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Frequency (%)</p> </td><td> <p>32(20)</p> </td><td> <p>26(14)</p> </td><td> <p>26(14)</p> </td><td> <p>29(15)</p> </td><td> <p>19(10)</p> </td><td> <p>27(14)</p> </td><td> <p>13(7)</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>17(9)</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"> <p><bold>Participants Age
  Group Distribution</bold></p> </td><td colspan="5"> <p><bold>Participants
  Qualifications</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td></td><td> <p>21-30</p> </td><td> <p>31-40</p> </td><td> <p>41-50</p> </td><td> <p>51-60</p> </td><td> <p>Bachelor</p> </td><td> <p>Master</p> </td><td> <p>MS</p> </td><td> <p>M.Phil</p> </td><td> <p>PhD</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Frequency (%)</p> </td><td> <p>56(30)</p> </td><td> <p>86(46)</p> </td><td> <p>32(17)</p> </td><td> <p>15(7)</p> </td><td> <p>4(2)</p> </td><td> <p>158(84)</p> </td><td> <p>6(03)</p> </td><td> <p>21(11)</p> </td><td> <p>0(00)</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"> <p><bold>Participants Sex</bold></p> </td><td colspan="5"> <p><bold>Participants’
  Marital Status</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2"> <p>F</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>Male</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>Single</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>Married</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Frequency (%)</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>1(01)</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>188(99)</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>57(30)</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>132(70)</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>Table 1 indicates that among the 188 instructors in the 8
cadet colleges that were part of the study, the majority (99.5%) are male,
while 69.8% are married, and 45.5% fall within the age range of 31 to 40. Out
of the total, 158 individuals, which accounts for 84%, hold master&apos;s degrees.</p> <p><break/></p>  <table-wrap id="table2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>Table 2</title></caption><table><thead><tr><th colspan="2"> <p><bold>Independent Variable (IV)</bold></p> </th><th colspan="7"> <p><bold>Correlation Coefficient</bold></p> </th><th colspan="2"> <p><bold>Interpretation</bold></p> </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="6" valign="top"> <p><bold>Factors</bold></p> </td><td> <p>Job
  Satisfaction</p> </td><td> <p>0.629**</p> </td><td></td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td><td rowspan="55"> <p><bold>Turnover Intention (DV)</bold></p>   </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Managerial
  Factor</p> </td><td> <p>0.586**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Job
  Stress</p> </td><td> <p>0.573**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Family
  Factor</p> </td><td> <p>0.567**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Individual
  Factor</p> </td><td> <p>0.501**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Financial
  Factor</p> </td><td> <p>0.387**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="9" valign="top"> <p><bold>Financial Factors Dimensions</bold></p> </td><td> <p>Teacher’s
  Salary</p> </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.391**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Financial
  Benefits for Teachers</p> </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.386**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Pensionable  Job</p> </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.384**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Allowances
  for Teacher</p> </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.366**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Promotion
  Opportunities</p> </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.317**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>GP
  Fund</p> </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.283**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Scholarships
  for Teacher Children</p> </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.203**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Higher
  Qualification Allowance</p> </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.179**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Incentives
  for Professional Development</p> </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.152*</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="10" valign="top"> <p><bold>Managerial Factor Dimensions</bold></p> </td><td> <p>Teacher&apos;s
  Job Security</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.557**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Well-defined/Described
  Job</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.516**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Friendly
  College Policies</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.472**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Owning
  Teacher&apos;s Decisions</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.472**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Fairness
  in Decision-making</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.467**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>The
  Reward of Teacher&apos;s Work</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.444**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Teacher
  Empowerment</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.388**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Performance
  Based Promotion</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.282**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Incentives
  for Additional Duties</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.250**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>The
  reputation of the College</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.247**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="15" valign="top"> <p><bold>Job Satisfaction Dimensions</bold></p> </td><td valign="bottom"> <p>Freedom
  of Expression</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.564**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Teachers
  Friendly Rules and Regulations</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.553**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Time
  for Domestic Activities</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.533**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Welfare
  Measure for the Teachers</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.490**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Time
  for Improving Qualifications</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.479**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Fringe
  Benefits for Teachers</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.465**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Involvement
  in Decision-making</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.398**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Approved
  Rules and Regulations</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.376**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Leaving
  College because Colleagues Joining other Institutions</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.350**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Salary
  Meeting Teachers&apos; Need</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.347**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Relationships
  between Teachers</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.341**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Work
  Environment</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.321**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>College
  Location</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.292**</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Unceremonial
  Teachers Termination</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.291*</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Conflicts
  among Teachers</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.165*</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5" valign="top"> <p><bold>Job Stress Dimensions</bold></p> </td><td valign="bottom"> <p>Friendly
  and Supportive Principal</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.517**</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>High</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Principal
  Authoritative Attitude</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.450**</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Teaching
  at College Stressful Job</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.448*</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Teachers
  Overburdened</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.400**</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Teacher&apos;s
  Not Trained for Work Demands</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.161*</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5" valign="top"> <p><bold>Individual Factors Dimensions</bold></p> </td><td valign="bottom"> <p>Ease
  to Commute to College</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.451**</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Bachelor
  Accommodation</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.366**</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Job
  Not Fulfilling Expectations</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.357**</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>College
  Reputation</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.234**</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Health
  Problems Forcing Quit Job</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.02</p> </td><td valign="bottom">  </td><td> <p>Insignificant</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5" valign="top"> <p><bold>Family
  Factor Dimensions</bold></p> </td><td valign="bottom"> <p>Family
  Accommodation for Teacher</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.483**</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Insufficient
  time for family</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.400**</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Reserve
  Seats for Teacher’s son</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.376**</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Moderate</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Medical
  Allowance for Teachers &amp; family</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.292**</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="bottom"> <p>Educational
  Institutions for</p> </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td>  </td><td> <p>0.191**</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Weak</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <p><italic>**
Correlation Significant at 0.01 (2-tailed), * Correlation Significant at 0.05
(2-tailed), n=189, Dependent variable = Turnover Intention</italic></p>  <p><break/></p> <p>The study found that job satisfaction, managerial factor,
job stress, family factor, and individual factor are highly correlated with
turnover intention (r =.629, p =.000; r =.586, p =.000; r =.573, p =.000; r
=.567, p =.000; r =.501, p =.000). Financial security, on the other hand, has a
moderate correlation with turnover intention.</p> <p>There is a moderately significant correlation between
turnover intent and five dimensions of financial factors: teacher&apos;s salary (r
=.391, p =.000), financial benefits for teachers (r =.386, p =.000),
pensionable jobs (r = -.384, p =.000), teacher allowances (r =.366, p =.000),
and promotion opportunities for teachers (r =.317, p =.000).</p> <p>There is a moderately strong correlation between five
managerial factors and turnover intent, a weak correlation between three
managerial factors, and a moderate correlation between two managerial factors
(teacher job security and job description).</p> <p>Three dimensions of job satisfaction i.e., freedom of
expression (r =.564, p = .000), teachers’ friendly rules and regulations (r =
.553, p = .000) and time for domestic activities (r = .533, p = .000) have high
significant correlation with turnover intention while its nine dimensions have
significant moderate correlation and the remaining three have weak significant
correlation with turnover intention.</p> <p>One of the five characteristics of job stress is strongly
connected with teachers&apos; intentions to leave their positions at cadet colleges,
while three others are somewhat correlated, and the fifth is weakly correlated.</p> <p>Turnover intent is not strongly correlated with any of the
individual factors. There is a weak correlation between college reputation (r
=.234,.001) and intention to leave, while there is a moderately significant
correlation between ease of commuting to college (r =.451, p =.000),
availability of bachelor accommodation (r =.366, p =.000), and job not meeting
expectations (r =.357, p =.000).</p> <p>The characteristics
of family factors and turnover intention did not significantly correlate with
one another. Three factors, such as the availability of family housing for
teachers (r =.483, p =.000), the lack of family time (r =.400, p =.000), and
reserved seats for teachers&apos; sons (r =.376, p =.000), have a significant
moderate correlation with turnover intention, whereas two factors, such as the
availability of medical insurance for teachers and their families (r =.292, p
=.000), and the accessibility of nearby educational institutions.</p> <p><break/></p>    <table-wrap id="table3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><title>Factors and Their Dimensions that Contribute to Turnover Intention</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="8"> <p><bold>Factors</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Multiple R</bold></p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p><bold>Coefficient of
  Determination (R<sup>2</sup>)</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Adjusted </bold></p> <p><bold>R<sup>2</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Standard Error of
  Estimation</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>.71</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>.50</p> </td><td> <p>.49</p> </td><td> <p>.82089</p> </td><td> <p>46.13</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Model Components</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>B</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Std. Error</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Beta</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>T</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>(Constant)</p> </td><td> <p>-.880</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.319</p> </td><td></td><td> <p>-2.756</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.006</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Job
  Satisfaction</p> </td><td> <p>.346</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.129</p> </td><td> <p>.23</p> </td><td> <p>2.688</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.008</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Job
  Stress</p> </td><td> <p>.357</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.090</p> </td><td> <p>.26</p> </td><td> <p>3.957</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Individual
  Factor</p> </td><td> <p>.312</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.104</p> </td><td> <p>.19</p> </td><td> <p>2.996</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.003</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Family
  Factor</p> </td><td> <p>.272</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.107</p> </td><td> <p>.20</p> </td><td> <p>2.536</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.012</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"> <p><bold>Dimensions of Financial Factor</bold></p> </td><td>  </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Multiple R</bold></p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p><bold>Coefficient of
  Determination (R<sup>2</sup>)</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Adjusted </bold></p> <p><bold>R<sup>2</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Standard Error of
  Estimation</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>.51</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>.26</p> </td><td> <p>.25</p> </td><td> <p>.99868</p> </td><td> <p>21.33</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Model Components</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>B</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Std. Error</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Beta</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>T</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>(Constant)</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>2.498</p> </td><td> <p>.349</p> </td><td></td><td> <p>7.153</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Teacher&apos;s
  Salary</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.238</p> </td><td> <p>.064</p> </td><td> <p>.26</p> </td><td> <p>3.699</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Pensionable
  Job</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>-.240</p> </td><td> <p>.052</p> </td><td> <p>-.31</p> </td><td> <p>-4.608</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>GP
  Fund</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.128</p> </td><td> <p>.053</p> </td><td> <p>.16</p> </td><td> <p>2.398</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.017</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"> <p><bold>Dimensions of Managerial  Factor</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Multiple R</bold></p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p><bold>Coefficient of
  Determination (R<sup>2</sup>)</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Adjusted R<sup>2</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Standard Error of
  Estimation</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>.63</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>.40</p> </td><td> <p>.39</p> </td><td> <p>.89669</p> </td><td> <p>41.28</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Model Components</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>B</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Std. Error</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Beta</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>T</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>(Constant)</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.975</p> </td><td> <p>.204</p> </td><td></td><td> <p>4.776</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Teacher’s
  Job Security</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.298</p> </td><td> <p>.056</p> </td><td> <p>.36</p> </td><td> <p>5.324</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Fairness  in Decision-making</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.181</p> </td><td> <p>.065</p> </td><td> <p>.20</p> </td><td> <p>2.798</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.006</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Well-defined/Described
  Job</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.189</p> </td><td> <p>.070</p> </td><td> <p>.21</p> </td><td> <p>2.700</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.008</p> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"> <p><bold>Dimensions of Job Satisfaction</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Multiple R</bold></p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p><bold>Coefficient of
  Determination (R<sup>2</sup>)</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Adjusted R<sup>2</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Standard Error of
  Estimation</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>.67</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>.45</p> </td><td> <p>.43</p> </td><td> <p>.86652</p> </td><td> <p>29.55</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Model Components</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>B</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Std. Error</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Beta</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>T</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>(Constant)</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.485</p> </td><td> <p>.266</p> </td><td></td><td> <p>1.823</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.070</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Freedom
  of Expression</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.169</p> </td><td> <p>.072</p> </td><td> <p>.20</p> </td><td> <p>2.351</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>.020</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Time
  for Domestic Activities</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.165</p> </td><td> <p>.065</p> </td><td> <p>.19</p> </td><td> <p>2.520</p> </td><td colspan="2" valign="top"> <p>.013</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Colleagues
  Joining Other Institutions</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.218</p> </td><td> <p>.060</p> </td><td> <p>.22</p> </td><td> <p>3.668</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Teachers
  Friendly Rules &amp; Regulations</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.194</p> </td><td> <p>.072</p> </td><td> <p>.22</p> </td><td> <p>2.678</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.008</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Working
  Environment</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.129</p> </td><td> <p>.064</p> </td><td> <p>.13</p> </td><td> <p>2.020</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.045</p> </td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>The above table shows that en-bloc contributes 50% (P=.000),
job satisfaction 23% (P=.008), job stress 26% (P=.000), individual and family
factors 19% (P=.000), and 20% (P=.012), respectively.</p> <p>The combined effect of the salaries of teachers (26%,
P=.000), the pensionable employment rate (31%, P=.000), and the GP fund
Facility (16%, P=.017) is 26% (P=.000). Teacher job stability, decision-making that
is fair, and having clearly defined expectations are all aspects of the
Managerial Factor. Turnover intent varies by 36% (P=.000), 20% (P=.006), and
21% (P=.008), all of</p> <p>which
may be attributed to the job.</p> <p>45% (P=.000) of the variation in turnover intention can be
attributed to the five factors of job satisfaction (freedom of expression, time
for domestic activities, colleagues joining other institutions,
teacher-friendly rules and regulations, and the working environment at the
College).</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> Dimensions of the
Factors that Contribute to Turnover Intention among the Teachers</p> <table-wrap id="table4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><title>Table 4</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="7"> <p><bold>Dimensions
  of Job Stress</bold></p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Multiple R</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Coefficient of
  Determination (R<sup>2</sup>)</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Adjusted R<sup>2</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Standard Error of
  Estimation</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>.61</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.37</p> </td><td> <p>.36</p> </td><td> <p>.92052</p> </td><td> <p>36.02</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Model Components</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>B</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Std. Error</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Beta</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>T</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>(Constant)</p> </td><td> <p>.919</p> </td><td> <p>.208</p> </td><td></td><td> <p>4.430</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>Friendly and Supportive Principal</p> </td><td> <p>.328</p> </td><td> <p>.061</p> </td><td> <p>.36</p> </td><td> <p>5.389</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>Principal&apos;s
  Authoritative Attitude</p> </td><td> <p>.208</p> </td><td> <p>.062</p> </td><td> <p>.23</p> </td><td> <p>3.355</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.001</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>Teaching
  Stressful Job</p> </td><td> <p>.179</p> </td><td> <p>.069</p> </td><td> <p>.18</p> </td><td> <p>2.578</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.011</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"> <p><bold>Dimensions of Individual Factor</bold></p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Multiple R</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Coefficient of
  Determination (R<sup>2</sup>)</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Adjusted R<sup>2</sup></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Standard Error of
  Estimation</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>.57</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.33</p> </td><td> <p>.32</p> </td><td> <p>.95049</p> </td><td> <p>29.96</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Model Components</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>B</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Std. Error</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Beta</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>T</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>(Constant)</p> </td><td> <p>.588</p> </td><td> <p>.279</p> </td><td></td><td> <p>2.110</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.036</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>Ease
  of Commute to College</p> </td><td> <p>.280</p> </td><td> <p>.060</p> </td><td> <p>.32</p> </td><td> <p>4.663</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>Job
  Not Fulfilling Expectations</p> </td><td> <p>.275</p> </td><td> <p>.056</p> </td><td> <p>.30</p> </td><td> <p>4.953</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td> <p>Bachelor
  Accommodation</p> </td><td> <p>.209</p> </td><td> <p>.067</p> </td><td> <p>.21</p> </td><td> <p>3.102</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.002</p> </td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"> <p><bold>Dimensions of Family Factor </bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Multiple R</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Coefficient of
  Determination (R<sup>2</sup>)</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Adjusted R<sup>2</sup><sub></sub></bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Standard Error of
  Estimation</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>.60</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.36</p> </td><td> <p>.35</p> </td><td> <p>.92364</p> </td><td> <p>35.36</p> </td><td colspan="2"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p><bold>Model Components</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>B</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Std. Error</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Beta</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>T</bold></p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>(Constant)</p> </td><td> <p>.844</p> </td><td> <p>.217</p> </td><td></td><td> <p>3.898</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Family
  Accommodation</p> </td><td> <p>.291</p> </td><td> <p>.054</p> </td><td> <p>.34</p> </td><td> <p>5.404</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Insufficient
  time for family</p> </td><td> <p>.243</p> </td><td> <p>.055</p> </td><td> <p>.27</p> </td><td> <p>4.451</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Reserve
  Seats for Teachers&apos; Son</p> </td><td> <p>.199</p> </td><td> <p>.050</p> </td><td> <p>.24</p> </td><td> <p>3.961</p> </td><td colspan="3"> <p>.000</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p><p>The above table illustrates that the three sources of job
stress—a principal who is pleasant and supportive, a principal who is
authoritative, and a hard job in teaching—together account for 37% (P=.000) of
the variance in the intention to leave.</p><p>Individual differences along the variables of college
commute time (32%, P=.000), job satisfaction (21%, P=.002), and living
arrangements (31%, P=.000) account for 33% (P=.000) of the variance in intent
to leave.</p><p>There are three
aspects of family life that contribute significantly to teachers&apos; intentions to
leave the profession: inadequate time to spend with family (34%, P=.000);
inadequate housing for teachers&apos; families (27%, P=.000); and reserved seating
for teachers&apos; sons (24%, P=.000).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6">
  <title>Main Findings</title>
<p>1.	Job satisfaction emerged as a significant factor influencing teachers&apos; turnover intention in Cadet Colleges in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Teachers who reported higher levels of job satisfaction were less likely to have turnover intentions.</p><p>2.	The study revealed that teachers&apos; perceptions of their compensation and benefits played a crucial role in turnover intention. Higher levels of dissatisfaction with pay and benefits increased the likelihood of turnover intention among teachers.</p><p>3.	The availability of professional development opportunities was found to be a significant factor influencing teachers&apos; turnover intention. Teachers who perceived limited growth prospects and insufficient opportunities for professional development were more likely to have turnover intentions.</p><p>4.	The level of organizational support provided to teachers was found to impact their turnover intention. Teachers who perceived higher levels of support from their superiors and colleagues were less likely to have turnover intentions.</p><p>5.	The study identified workload and job demands as significant contributors to teachers&apos; turnover intention. Teachers who experienced high workloads, excessive administrative tasks, and job demands were more likely to express turnover intentions.</p><p>6.	The effectiveness of leadership within Cadet Colleges emerged as an influential factor. Teachers who perceived ineffective leadership, lack of communication, and inadequate decision-making processes were more likely to have turnover intentions.</p><p>7.	The study found that teachers&apos; perceptions of their work-life balance significantly influenced turnover intention. Teachers who reported difficulties in maintaining a healthy work-life balance were more likely to express intentions to leave their current positions.</p><p>8.	The level of job security perceived by teachers had an impact on their turnover intention. Teachers who felt insecure in their positions, such as due to temporary contracts or lack of job stability, were more likely to express intentions to leave.</p><p>9.	The study highlighted the importance of organizational culture in influencing teachers&apos; turnover intention. Teachers who perceived a negative or toxic work environment were more likely to have intentions to quit.</p><p>10.	Lastly, personal factors, such as age, marital status, and years of teaching experience, were found to have a significant but relatively moderate influence on teachers&apos; turnover intention.</p><p>These findings provide valuable insights into the factors that contribute to teachers&apos; turnover intention in Cadet Colleges in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Understanding these factors can help educational institutions and policymakers develop effective strategies and interventions to enhance teacher retention and promote a positive work environment within the education sector.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-7">
  <title>Discussion of the Findings</title>
<p>The research examined the phenomenon of faculty turnover within cadet colleges located in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region. The factors that were taken into consideration include financial, managerial, job satisfaction, job stress, individual, and family. The study findings suggest that factors such as individual characteristics, familial circumstances, occupational stress, and job contentment serve as mediators in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. The correlation between management style, remuneration, job satisfaction and the likelihood of an individual&apos;s intention to leave their current job is noteworthy.  These findings corroborate the job satisfaction-quit tendency link. Senior and talented employees leaving lowers morale and increases turnover (Bhatti &amp; Qureshi, 2007; Glebbeek &amp; Bax, 2004; Temple, Dobbs, &amp; Andel, 2011); (Perryer, Jordan, Firns, &amp; Travaglione, 2010). Occupational stress predicted willingness to leave second most out of the six traits. Cadet colleges are managed by military officers who value discipline and power, so this is understandable. (Eaton, 2001). The positive results of the survey regarding the turnover intentions of the participants align with the research conducted by (Pillay, Goddard, &amp; Wilss, 2005), which revealed that a significant proportion of the sample consisted of married males.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-8">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Turnover intent is highly correlated with five of the six examined criteria, and somewhat correlated with the remaining financial element. Turnover intent is significantly correlated with multiple aspects of these characteristics. Similar to how job happiness, job stress, and personal and family issues all play a role, these three selected criteria account for the bulk of turnover intent. Taken separately, these variables contribute to a model that explains the wide range of resignation intentions among cadet college instructors in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. All of the hypotheses were correct, and the study&apos;s results prove them.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-9">
  <title>Recommendations</title>
<p>1.	Evaluate the quantity and nature of tasks assigned to educators and pinpoint specific domains where it may be feasible to diminish or enhance its management. It is advisable to contemplate the recruitment of supplementary personnel or the reallocation of duties to guarantee that educators are presented with a feasible workload.</p><p>2.	Facilitate efficient communication channels among educators, executives, and leadership to enhance organisational effectiveness. To foster effective collaboration, it is recommended to promote open dialogue, establish feedback mechanisms, and implement a participatory decision-making process to address concerns.</p><p>3.	It is recommended to allocate resources towards professional development initiatives that are tailored to meet the unique requirements of educators in cadet colleges. Provide instructional sessions and seminars that concentrate on augmenting pedagogical techniques, subject matter expertise, and teaching proficiency.</p><p>4.	It is crucial to acknowledge the significance of maintaining a work-life balance for educators. Incorporate measures and protocols that promote a favourable equilibrium between work and personal life, such as adaptable scheduling, absence regulations, and avenues for individual development.</p><p><break/></p><p>Recommendations for Further Study</p><p>1.	A comparative analysis is necessary to assess the propensity of teachers to leave their positions in cadet colleges in comparison to those in other educational establishments. Determine distinctive variables that influence the propensity to leave employment in the setting of cadet colleges.</p><p>2.	Additional research is necessary to examine the efficacy of various support mechanisms, including mentoring initiatives, peer collaboration, and professional networks, in mitigating the inclination of educators to leave their positions in cadet colleges.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group content-type="conflict-of-interest">
  <title>Conflict of Interest</title>
  <fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="ethics-statement">
  <title>Ethics Statement</title>
  <fn fn-type="ethics">
<p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="data-availability">
  <title>Data Availability</title>
  <fn fn-type="data-availability-statement">
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<app-group>
  <app id="app-suppl">
    <title>Supplementary Materials</title>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com/pdf/gesr/XcMdDMIIrT.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  </app>
</app-group>
<ref-list>
  <title>References</title>
<ref id="Bhatti">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Bhatti, K. K., &amp; Qureshi, T. M</person-group>
    <year>2007</year>
    <article-title>. Impact of employee participation on job satisfaction, employee commitment and employee productivity</article-title>
    <source>International review of business research papers</source>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>54</fpage>
    <lpage>68</lpage>
    Bhatti, K. K., &amp; Qureshi, T. M. (2007). Impact of employee participation on job satisfaction, employee commitment and employee productivity. International review of business research papers, 3(2), 54-68.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Eaton">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Eaton, S. C</person-group>
    <year>2001</year>
    <article-title>. What a difference management makes! Nursing staff turnover variation within a single labor market</article-title>
    <source>Paper presented at the Report to Congress: Appropriateness of minimum nurse staffing ratios in nursing homes phase II final report</source>
    <page-range>aper</page-range>
    Eaton, S. C. (2001). What a difference management makes! Nursing staff turnover variation within a single labor market. Paper presented at the Report to Congress: Appropriateness of minimum nurse staffing ratios in nursing homes phase II final report.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Esop">
  <label>3</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Esop, M., &amp; Timms, C</person-group>
    <year>2019</year>
    <article-title>. Relevance of organisational support on academicsâ€™ affective commitment and turnover intentions</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education</source>
    <volume>11</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>118</fpage>
    Esop, M., &amp; Timms, C. (2019). Relevance of organisational support on academicsâ€™ affective commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 118â€“128.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/jarhe-07-2018-0126</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-07-2018-0126">10.1108/jarhe-07-2018-0126</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Flammarion">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Flammarion, P., Devaux, A., Nehls, S., Migeon, B., Noury, P., &amp; Garric, J</person-group>
    <year>2002</year>
    <article-title>. Multibiomarker Responses in Fish from the Moselle River (France)</article-title>
    <source>Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety</source>
    <volume>51</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>145</fpage>
    Flammarion, P., Devaux, A., Nehls, S., Migeon, B., Noury, P., &amp; Garric, J. (2002). Multibiomarker Responses in Fish from the Moselle River (France). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 51(2), 145â€“153.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/eesa.2001.2134</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.2001.2134">10.1006/eesa.2001.2134</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Ghiselli">
  <label>5</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Ghiselli, R</person-group>
    <year>2001</year>
    <article-title>. Job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and turnover intent among food-service managers</article-title>
    <source>The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly</source>
    <volume>42</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>28</fpage>
    Ghiselli, R. (2001). Job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and turnover intent among food-service managers. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 28â€“37.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0010-8804(01)80036-7</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-8804(01)80036-7">10.1016/s0010-8804(01)80036-7</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Glebbeek">
  <label>6</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Glebbeek, A. C., &amp; Bax, E. H</person-group>
    <year>2004</year>
    <article-title>. Is High Employee Turnover Really Harmful? An Empirical Test Using Company Records</article-title>
    <source>Academy of Management Journal</source>
    <volume>47</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>277</fpage>
    Glebbeek, A. C., &amp; Bax, E. H. (2004). Is High Employee Turnover Really Harmful? An Empirical Test Using Company Records. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 277â€“286.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5465/20159578</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5465/20159578">10.5465/20159578</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Holtom">
  <label>7</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., &amp; Eberly, M. B</person-group>
    <year>2008</year>
    <article-title>. Turnover and Retention Research: A Glance at the Past, a Closer Review of the Present, and a Venture into the Future</article-title>
    <source>The Academy of Management Annals</source>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>231</fpage>
    Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., &amp; Eberly, M. B. (2008). Turnover and Retention Research: A Glance at the Past, a Closer Review of the Present, and a Venture into the Future. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 231â€“274.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19416520802211552</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211552">10.1080/19416520802211552</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Khatri">
  <label>8</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Khatri, N., Fern, C. T., &amp; Budhwar, P</person-group>
    <year>2001</year>
    <article-title>. Explaining employee turnover in an Asian context</article-title>
    <source>Human Resource Management Journal</source>
    <volume>11</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>54</fpage>
    Khatri, N., Fern, C. T., &amp; Budhwar, P. (2001). Explaining employee turnover in an Asian context. Human Resource Management Journal, 11(1), 54â€“74.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-8583.2001.tb00032.x</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2001.tb00032.x">10.1111/j.1748-8583.2001.tb00032.x</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Kim">
  <label>9</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Kim, M., Knutson, B. J., &amp; Choi, L</person-group>
    <year>2015</year>
    <article-title>. The Effects of Employee Voice and Delight on Job Satisfaction and Behaviors: Comparison Between Employee Generations</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Hospitality Marketing &amp; Management</source>
    <volume>25</volume>
    <issue>5</issue>
    <fpage>563</fpage>
    Kim, M., Knutson, B. J., &amp; Choi, L. (2015). The Effects of Employee Voice and Delight on Job Satisfaction and Behaviors: Comparison Between Employee Generations. Journal of Hospitality Marketing &amp; Management, 25(5), 563â€“588.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19368623.2015.1067665</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2015.1067665">10.1080/19368623.2015.1067665</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Koh">
  <label>10</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Koh, H. C., &amp; Goh, C. T</person-group>
    <year>1995</year>
    <article-title>. An analysis of the factors affecting the turnover intention of non-managerial clerical staff: a Singapore study</article-title>
    <source>The International Journal of Human Resource Management</source>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>103</fpage>
    Koh, H. C., &amp; Goh, C. T. (1995). An analysis of the factors affecting the turnover intention of non-managerial clerical staff: a Singapore study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 103â€“125.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09585199500000005</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199500000005">10.1080/09585199500000005</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Koul">
  <label>11</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Koul, R. B., &amp; Fisher, D. L</person-group>
    <year>2006</year>
    <article-title>. A contemporary study of learning environments in Jammu, India</article-title>
    <source>In Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: Worldviews (pp. 273-296): World Scientific</source>
    <fpage>273</fpage>
    <lpage>296</lpage>
    Koul, R. B., &amp; Fisher, D. L. (2006). A contemporary study of learning environments in Jammu, India. In Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: Worldviews (pp. 273-296): World Scientific.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Ladd">
  <label>12</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Ladd, H. F., &amp; Sorensen, L. C</person-group>
    <year>2017</year>
    <article-title>. Returns to Teacher Experience: Student Achievement and Motivation in Middle School</article-title>
    <source>Education Finance and Policy</source>
    <volume>12</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>241</fpage>
    Ladd, H. F., &amp; Sorensen, L. C. (2017). Returns to Teacher Experience: Student Achievement and Motivation in Middle School. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241â€“279.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1162/edfp_a_00194</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00194">10.1162/edfp_a_00194</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Liu">
  <label>13</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Liu, H., Huang, Y., Duan, W., Qiao, C., Shen, Q., &amp; Li, R</person-group>
    <year>2020</year>
    <article-title>. Microbial community composition turnover and function in the mesophilic phase predetermine chicken manure composting efficiency</article-title>
    <source>Bioresource Technology</source>
    <page-range>hase</page-range>
    Liu, H., Huang, Y., Duan, W., Qiao, C., Shen, Q., &amp; Li, R. (2020). Microbial community composition turnover and function in the mesophilic phase predetermine chicken manure composting efficiency. Bioresource Technology, 313, 123658â€“123658.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123658</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123658">10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123658</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Perez">
  <label>14</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Perez, J., &amp; Mirabella, J</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. The relationship between leadership practices and restaurant employee turnover</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Accounting Information Science &amp; Leadership</source>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>18</issue>
    <fpage>40</fpage>
    <lpage>47</lpage>
    Perez, J., &amp; Mirabella, J. (2013). The relationship between leadership practices and restaurant employee turnover. International Journal of Accounting Information Science &amp; Leadership, 6(18), 40-47.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Perryer">
  <label>15</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Perryer, C., Jordan, C., Firns, I., &amp; Travaglione, A</person-group>
    <year>2010</year>
    <article-title>. Predicting turnover intentions: The interactive effects of organizational commitment and perceived organizational support</article-title>
    <source>Management Research Review</source>
    <volume>33</volume>
    <issue>9</issue>
    <fpage>911</fpage>
    Perryer, C., Jordan, C., Firns, I., &amp; Travaglione, A. (2010). Predicting turnover intentions: The interactive effects of organizational commitment and perceived organizational support. Management Research Review, 33(9), 911â€“923.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/01409171011070323</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171011070323">10.1108/01409171011070323</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Pillay">
  <label>16</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Pillay, H., Goddard, R., &amp; Wilss, L</person-group>
    <year>2005</year>
    <article-title>. Well- Being, Burnout and Competence: Implications for Teachers</article-title>
    <source>Australian Journal of Teacher Education</source>
    <page-range>illay</page-range>
    Pillay, H., Goddard, R., &amp; Wilss, L. (2005). Well- Being, Burnout and Competence: Implications for Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2).
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14221/ajte.2005v30n2.3</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2005v30n2.3">10.14221/ajte.2005v30n2.3</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Sanderson">
  <label>17</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Sanderson, A. R., &amp; Siegfried, J. J</person-group>
    <year>2003</year>
    <article-title>. Thinking about Competitive Balance</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Sports Economics</source>
    <volume>4</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>255</fpage>
    Sanderson, A. R., &amp; Siegfried, J. J. (2003). Thinking about Competitive Balance. Journal of Sports Economics, 4(4), 255â€“279.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1527002503257321</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002503257321">10.1177/1527002503257321</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Schaufeli">
  <label>18</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Schaufeli, W. B., &amp; Bakker, A. B</person-group>
    <year>2004</year>
    <article-title>. Job demands, Job resources, and Their Relationship with Burnout and engagement: a multi-sample Study</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Organizational Behavior</source>
    <volume>25</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>293</fpage>
    Schaufeli, W. B., &amp; Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, Job resources, and Their Relationship with Burnout and engagement: a multi-sample Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293â€“315.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/job.248</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248">10.1002/job.248</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Shah">
  <label>19</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Shah, I. A., Fakhr, Z., Ahmad, M. S., &amp; Zaman, K</person-group>
    <year>2010</year>
    <article-title>. Measuring push, pull and personal factors affecting turnover intention: a case of university teachers in Pakistan</article-title>
    <source>Review of Economic and Business studies</source>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>167</fpage>
    <lpage>192</lpage>
    Shah, I. A., Fakhr, Z., Ahmad, M. S., &amp; Zaman, K. (2010). Measuring push, pull and personal factors affecting turnover intention: a case of university teachers in Pakistan. Review of Economic and Business studies, 3(1), 167-192.
    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://core.ac.uk/reader/6919830">https://core.ac.uk/reader/6919830</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Shaw">
  <label>20</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., Johnson, J. L., &amp; Lockhart, D. E</person-group>
    <year>2005</year>
    <article-title>. Turnover, Social Capital Losses, and Performance</article-title>
    <source>Academy of Management Journal</source>
    <volume>48</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>594</fpage>
    Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., Johnson, J. L., &amp; Lockhart, D. E. (2005). Turnover, Social Capital Losses, and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 594â€“606.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5465/amj.2005.17843940</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17843940">10.5465/amj.2005.17843940</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Sinniah">
  <label>21</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Sinniah, S., &amp; Kamil, N. M</person-group>
    <year>2017</year>
    <article-title>. The influence of human resource practices on turnover intention: The case of a telecommunication company in Malaysia</article-title>
    <source>Malaysian Management Review</source>
    <volume>52</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>45</fpage>
    <lpage>61</lpage>
    Sinniah, S., &amp; Kamil, N. M. (2017). The influence of human resource practices on turnover intention: The case of a telecommunication company in Malaysia. Malaysian Management Review, 52(1), 45-61
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Staw">
  <label>22</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Staw, B. M</person-group>
    <year>1980</year>
    <article-title>. The Consequences of Turnover</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Occupational Behaviour</source>
    <volume>1</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <fpage>253</fpage>
    Staw, B. M. (1980). The Consequences of Turnover. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 1(4), 253â€“273.
    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/300014">http://www.jstor.org/stable/300014</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Swailes">
  <label>23</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Swailes, S., &amp; Al Fahdi, S</person-group>
    <year>2011</year>
    <article-title>. Voluntary Turnover in the Omani Public Sector: An Islamic Values Perspective</article-title>
    <source>International Journal of Public Administration</source>
    <volume>34</volume>
    <issue>10</issue>
    <fpage>682</fpage>
    Swailes, S., &amp; Al Fahdi, S. (2011). Voluntary Turnover in the Omani Public Sector: An Islamic Values Perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(10), 682â€“692.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01900692.2011.583770</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.583770">10.1080/01900692.2011.583770</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Taylor">
  <label>24</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Taylor, S. L., &amp; Cosenza, R. M</person-group>
    <year>1998</year>
    <article-title>. Reducing Turnover in Public Accounting Firms: An Internal Marketing Strategy</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Professional Services Marketing</source>
    <volume>17</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>135</fpage>
    Taylor, S. L., &amp; Cosenza, R. M. (1998). Reducing Turnover in Public Accounting Firms: An Internal Marketing Strategy. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 17(2), 135â€“ 157.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1300/j090v17n02_10</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1300/j090v17n02_10">10.1300/j090v17n02_10</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Temple">
  <label>25</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Temple, A., Dobbs, D., &amp; Andel, R</person-group>
    <year>2011</year>
    <article-title>. Exploring correlates of turnover among nursing assistants in the National Nursing Home Survey</article-title>
    <source>JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration</source>
    Temple, A., Dobbs, D., &amp; Andel, R. (2011). Exploring correlates of turnover among nursing assistants in the National Nursing Home Survey. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(Supplement), S34â€“S42.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/nna.0b013e318221c34b</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0b013e318221c34b">10.1097/nna.0b013e318221c34b</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>