<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">52</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="short-title">gesr</journal-id>
  <journal-id journal-id-type="doi">10.31703/gesr</journal-id>
  <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Global Educational Studies Review</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">gesr</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group>
  <issn publication-format="print">2708-2113</issn>
  <issn publication-format="electronic">2708-3608</issn>
  <self-uri xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com"/>
  <publisher>
    <publisher-name>Humanity Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Pakistan</publisher-loc>
  </publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
  <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">392647</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-II).07</article-id>
  <article-id pub-id-type="other" specific-use="submission-id">3116</article-id>
  <article-version article-version-type="publisher">1.0</article-version>
  <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
      <subject>article</subject>
    </subj-group>
  </article-categories>
  <title-group>
    <article-title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program Working Under TEVTA in Punjab</article-title>
  </title-group>
<contrib-group>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="1" corresp="yes">
    <name>
      <surname>Gull</surname>
      <given-names>Mehwish Gull</given-names>
    </name>
    <email>mehwishgull65@gmail.com</email>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing – original draft</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="2">
    <name>
      <surname>Ch.</surname>
      <given-names>Abid Hussain Ch.</given-names>
    </name>
    <email>mehwishgull65@gmail.com</email>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
  </contrib>
  <contrib contrib-type="author" seq="3">
    <name>
    </name>
    <role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing – review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
  </contrib>
  <aff id="aff1">
    <label>1</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <named-content content-type="author-role">PhD Scholar</named-content>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
  <aff id="aff2">
    <label>2</label>
    <institution-wrap>
      <institution>Dean, Faculty of Education Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore</institution>
    </institution-wrap>
    <addr-line>Punjab</addr-line>
    <country>Pakistan</country>
  </aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
  <corresp id="cor1">Corresponding Author: Mehwish Gull, PhD Scholar, Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore,Punjab, Pakistan.. Email: <email>mehwishgull65@gmail.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="fn-coi">
  <p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="ethics-statement" id="fn-ethics">
  <p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="data-availability-statement" id="fn-data">
  <p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
  <day>30</day>
  <month>06</month>
  <year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
  <month>06</month>
  <year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print">
  <day>02</day>
  <month>06</month>
  <year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
  <volume>6</volume>
  <issue>2</issue>
  <season>Spring</season>
  <fpage>74</fpage>
  <lpage>82</lpage>
  <history>
    <date date-type="accepted">
      <day>02</day>
      <month>06</month>
      <year>2022</year>
    </date>
  </history>
<funding-group>
  <funding-statement>
<p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p>
  </funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<permissions>
  <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
  <copyright-holder>Humanity Publications</copyright-holder>
  <license license-type="open-access" xml:lang="en" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
  </license>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="text/html" xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com/article/Effectiveness-of-Diploma-of-Associate-Engineers-DAE-Program-Working-under-TEVTA-in-Punjab"/>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com/pdf/gesr/3MhtTUJxQx.pdf"/>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com/pdf/gesr/3MhtTUJxQx.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  <abstract>
    <p>Present study was aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program working under TEVTA. The population of the study was comprised of all the employees (Civil, Mechanical and Electrical) working in public and private organizations in Punjab. Employees were selected on a convenient basis. Therefore, 143 employees were a sample of the study. A questionnaire for employees was adapted to collect the data. The reliability of the instrument was 0.847. Findings revealed that employees were satisfied with the DAE curriculum, physical facilities, and administrative facilities at their workplace. On the other hand, employees were not very satisfied with their assessment and evaluation systems and social factors affecting their workplaces. A significant mean difference was found in employees perceptions regarding the effectiveness of DAE regarding their locale, job type, and trade. It is recommended that DAE graduates might be trained according to the industry demand rather than conventional knowledge.</p>
  </abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
  <kwd>Curriculum</kwd>
  <kwd>Physical Facilities</kwd>
  <kwd>Administrative Facilities</kwd>
  <kwd>Assessment and Evaluation System</kwd>
  <kwd>Social Factors</kwd>
</kwd-group>
  <custom-meta-group>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>views</meta-name><meta-value>996</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>downloads</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>html-views</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>google-scholar-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
    <custom-meta><meta-name>crossref-citations</meta-name><meta-value>0</meta-value></custom-meta>
  </custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1">
  <title>Introduction</title>
<p>In general, the term &quot;Technical Education&quot; (TE) refers to postsecondary courses of study and practical training aimed at preparing technicians with technical skills over a two or three year period and technicians to work as early technicians in labour markets. Additionally, TE is a prerequisite for admission to higher technical education, engineering programs, and training. The term &quot;Vocational Training&quot; (VT) refers to a lower level of practical education and training that prepares a population of skilled or semi-skilled workers in a variety of trades/skills but does not raise their degree of education beyond the elementary level. Thus, &quot;Technical and Vocational Education and Training&quot; (TVET) is an applied component of education and training with a direct connection to early and rapid labour market entry. TVET equips workers with the necessary skills to take advantage of labour market possibilities such as employment contracts, wage premiums, union membership, efficiency wages, health benefits, and improving cognitive and non-cognitive based quotients for increased earnings, among others (Herr, 2013).</p><p>A country&apos;s economic competitiveness is directly related to the capabilities of its workers. The workforce&apos;s skills and competencies, in turn, are contingent on the quality of the country&apos;s education and training systems (Mustapha, &amp; Greeman, 2002). Additionally, (Aina, 2006) asserts that education is unquestionably the basis of any meaningful development, whereas Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET) is the bedrock of any sustainable technical development program. Thus, TVET is seen as workforce education that, in its traditional function, aids in the adjustment of man&apos;s skills and knowledge to changing societal needs. This kind of teaching is purposefully intended to assist man in developing his abilities. It puts a premium on the development of people&apos; skills in their chosen professions (Olaitan, 1993). Thus, TVET plays a critical role in improving the quality of work and the quality of TVET graduates, boosting job satisfaction and motivation, as well as increasing productivity (Manifred &amp; Jennifer, 2004). Thus, TVET is anticipated to create an educated, competent, and motivated workforce in the changing economic climate.</p><p>Global socioeconomic developments are posing difficulties to the educational and industrial sectors. This tendency has resulted in economic, political, and social crises that have jeopardized certain countries&apos; political and economic stability. According to (Giroux, 1991), increasing unemployment, a shortage of qualified employees, high dropout rates, and the changing demographic makeup of the workforce have elevated the problem of workforce education to the top of many countries&apos; educational reform agendas. According to this perspective, (Okolocha, 2006) noted that the high rate of unemployment and changing face of the global economic, social, political, and labour markets have resulted in new education reforms/policies with a focus on TVET aimed at assisting adolescents and adults in becoming self-sufficient.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2">
  <title>Objectives of the Study</title>
<p>Objectives of the study were to;</p><p>1.	Find out the level of employees’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) program at the workplace.</p><p>2.	Investigate significant mean differences of employees’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) program at the workplace regarding their selected demographic variables (locale, job type, trade, qualification, age and experience).</p><p><break/></p><p>Research Questions</p><p>Following were the research questions of the study.</p><p>1.	What is the level of employees’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) program at the workplace?</p><p>2.	Is there any significant mean difference in employees’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) program at the workplace regarding their selected demographic variables (locale, job type, trade, qualification, age and experience)?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<p>The present study was quantitative in nature. The population of the study was comprised of all the employees (Civil, Mechanical and Electrical) working in public and private organizations in Punjab. Employees were selected on a convenient basis. Therefore, 143 employees were a sample of the study. A survey questionnaire for employees was adapted to find out their views about the effectiveness of the Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) at their job place. The reliability of the instrument was 0.847. Data were collected personally by the researcher. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were used to analyze data. Results in the form of tables are given below.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-4">
  <title>Results</title>
<p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Employees’ Level
of Perceptions about Effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE)
Program Proposed by TEVTA</p> <table-wrap id="table1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><title>Table 1</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Measures</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>N</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Minimum</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Maximum</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Mean</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Std. Deviation</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Curriculum</p> </td><td> <p>143</p> </td><td> <p>13.00</p> </td><td> <p>35.00</p> </td><td> <p>29.09</p> </td><td> <p>3.37</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Physical Facilities at Job Place</p> </td><td> <p>143</p> </td><td> <p>23.00</p> </td><td> <p>50.00</p> </td><td> <p>40.79</p> </td><td> <p>7.27</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Administrative Facilities at the Job place</p> </td><td> <p>143</p> </td><td> <p>35.00</p> </td><td> <p>65.00</p> </td><td> <p>51.50</p> </td><td> <p>6.25</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Assessment and Evaluation</p> </td><td> <p>143</p> </td><td> <p>5.00</p> </td><td> <p>15.00</p> </td><td> <p>11.84</p> </td><td> <p>1.87</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Social Factor</p> </td><td> <p>143</p> </td><td> <p>9.00</p> </td><td> <p>20.00</p> </td><td> <p>15.09</p> </td><td> <p>2.62</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>Table 1 indicates
employees’ level of perceptions about the effectiveness of the Diploma of
Associate Engineers (DAE) proposed by TEVTA in different aspects. Study
findings revealed that the factor administrative facilities (M=51.50, SD=6.25)
and physical facilities (M= 40.79, SD= 7.27) having high mean scores, which
mean employees are provided proper job facilities at their workplace. Whereas
social factors have a low mean score (M=15.09, SD=2.62) which indicates that
employees were a little bit anxious about social factors and kept continuing
their practices. Moreover, they were also seems contented with the DAE
curriculum (29.09, SD=3.37) taught to them, whereas they were not truly
satisfied with the assessment and evaluation system at the workplace.</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Comparison of Rural and Urban Employees’ Perceptions about
Effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program at Work Place</p> <table-wrap id="table2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><title>Table 2</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Locality</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>N</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>M</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>SD</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>t-
  value</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Curriculum</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Rural</p> <p>Urban</p> </td><td> <p>31</p> <p>112</p> </td><td> <p>28.09</p> <p>29.36</p> </td><td> <p>2.48</p> <p>3.54</p> </td><td> <p>67.666</p> </td><td> <p>-2.276</p> </td><td> <p>0.026</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Physical Facilities at Job Place</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Rural</p> <p>Urban</p> </td><td> <p>31</p> <p>112</p> </td><td> <p>34.61</p> <p>42.50</p> </td><td> <p>4.79</p> <p>6.91</p> </td><td> <p>68.397</p> </td><td> <p>-7.297</p> </td><td> <p>0.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Administrative Facilities</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Rural</p> <p>Urban</p> </td><td> <p>31</p> <p>112</p> </td><td> <p>48.38</p> <p>52.36</p> </td><td> <p>4.08</p> <p>6.49</p> </td><td> <p>76.413</p> </td><td> <p>-4.159</p> </td><td> <p>0.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Assessment and Evaluation</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Rural</p> <p>Urban</p> </td><td> <p>31</p> <p>112</p> </td><td> <p>11.74</p> <p>11.87</p> </td><td> <p>1.73</p> <p>1.91</p> </td><td> <p>141</p> </td><td> <p>-0.349</p> </td><td> <p>0.728</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Social Factors</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Rural</p> <p>Urban</p> </td><td> <p>31</p> <p>112</p> </td><td> <p>16.12</p> <p>14.80</p> </td><td> <p>2.18</p> <p>2.67</p> </td><td> <p>57.312</p> </td><td> <p>2.533</p> </td><td> <p>0.006</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>An independent
samples t-test was applied to find out the rural and urban employees’
perceptions about the effectiveness of the DAE program based on five factors at
the workplace.  Findings revealed that a significant
difference between rural and urban employees’ perceptions about DAE curriculum,
physical facilities, administrative facilities, and social factors was found at
p?0.05 level of significance at the workplace. However, there was no
significant difference between rural and urban employees’ perceptions found
regarding assessment and evaluation systems at p?0.05 level of significance at the
workplace.</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 3.</bold> Comparison of Public and Private Sector Employees’
Perceptions about Effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program
at Work Place</p> <table-wrap id="table3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><title>Table 3</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </td><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Job Type</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>N</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>M</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>SD</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>t- value</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Curriculum</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Public</p> <p>Private</p> </td><td> <p>66</p> <p>77</p> </td><td> <p>28.21</p> <p>29.84</p> </td><td> <p>2.90</p> <p>3.58</p> </td><td> <p>140.549</p> </td><td> <p>-3.007</p> </td><td> <p>0.003</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Physical
  Facilities at Job Place</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Public</p> <p>Private</p> </td><td> <p>66</p> <p>77</p> </td><td> <p>37.74</p> <p>43.40</p> </td><td> <p>7.37</p> <p>6.10</p> </td><td> <p>126.432</p> </td><td> <p>-4.947</p> </td><td> <p>0.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Administrative
  Facilities</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Public</p> <p>Private</p> </td><td> <p>66</p> <p>77</p> </td><td> <p>49.95</p> <p>52.83</p> </td><td> <p>5.57</p> <p>6.54</p> </td><td> <p>140.996</p> </td><td> <p>-2.840</p> </td><td> <p>0.005</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Assessment and
  Evaluation</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Public</p> <p>Private</p> </td><td> <p>66</p> <p>77</p> </td><td> <p>11.95</p> <p>11.75</p> </td><td> <p>1.74</p> <p>1.98</p> </td><td> <p>140.930</p> </td><td> <p>0.639</p> </td><td> <p>0.520</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Social Factors</p> </td><td valign="top"> <p>Public</p> <p>Private</p> </td><td> <p>66</p> <p>77</p> </td><td> <p>15.72</p> <p>14.54</p> </td><td> <p>2.44</p> <p>2.67</p> </td><td> <p>140.422</p> </td><td> <p>2.762</p> </td><td> <p>0.007</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>In
above table 3, the public and private sector employees’ perceptions about the effectiveness
of the DAE program based on five factors at the workplace were compared by
applying independent samples t-test. 
Findings revealed that a significant difference between public and
private sector employees’ perceptions about DAE curriculum, physical
facilities, administrative facilities, and social factors was found at p?0.05
level of significance at workplace. On the other hand, employees have no
significant difference in assessment and evaluation systems in the
organizations they were working at p?0.05 level of significance.</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> Program Wise Comparison of Employees’ Perceptions about
Effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program</p> <table-wrap id="table4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><title>Table 4</title></caption><table><thead><tr><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Sum of Square</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Mean Square</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td> <p>Curriculum</p> </td><td> <p>46.132</p> <p>1573.686</p> <p>1619.818</p> </td><td> <p>23.066</p> <p>11.241</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> <p>140</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>2.052</p> </td><td> <p>0.132</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Physical
  Facilities at Job Place</p> </td><td> <p>1727.706</p> <p>5782.000</p> <p>7509.706</p> </td><td> <p>863.853</p> <p>41.300</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> <p>140</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>20.917</p> </td><td> <p>0.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Administrative Facilities</p> </td><td> <p>495.290</p> <p>5066.458</p> <p>5561.748</p> </td><td> <p>247.645</p> <p>36.189</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> <p>140</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>6.843</p> </td><td> <p>0.001</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Assessment and
  Evaluation</p> </td><td> <p>1.108</p> <p>497.507</p> <p>498.615</p> </td><td> <p>0.554</p> <p>3.554</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> <p>140</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>0.156</p> </td><td> <p>0.856</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Social Factors</p> </td><td> <p>76.069</p> <p>903.749</p> <p>979.818</p> </td><td> <p>38.035</p> <p>6.455</p> </td><td> <p>2</p> <p>140</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>5.892</p> </td><td> <p>0.003</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>In table 4 the
employees’ (Civil, Electrical and Mechanical) perceptions about the effectiveness
of the DAE program based on five factors at the workplace was compared by
applying One-way ANOVA.  Findings
revealed that a significant difference between employees’ (Civil, Electrical
and Mechanical) perceptions regarding physical facilities, administrative
facilities, and social factors was found at p?0.05 level of significance at the
workplace. On the other hand, employees (Civil, Electrical and Mechanical) have
no significant difference about DAE curriculum and assessment and evaluation
system in the organizations they were working at p?0.05 level of significance.</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 4(a).</bold> Program
Wise Comparison of Employees’ Perceptions about Effectiveness of Diploma of
Associate Engineers (DAE) Program (Post hoc Tukey, HSD)</p> <table-wrap id="table5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><title>Table 5</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> <p><bold>(I) Program</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>(J) Program</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Mean Difference (I-J)</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Std. Error</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"> <p>Civil</p> </td><td> <p>Electrical</p> </td><td> <p>-11.24109<sup>*</sup></p> </td><td> <p>2.82543</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Mechanical</p> </td><td> <p>-12.16878<sup>*</sup></p> </td><td> <p>2.85023</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"> <p>Electrical</p> </td><td> <p>Civil</p> </td><td> <p>11.24109<sup>*</sup></p> </td><td> <p>2.82543</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Mechanical</p> </td><td> <p>-.92769</p> </td><td> <p>2.67947</p> </td><td> <p>.936</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"> <p>Mechanical</p> </td><td> <p>Civil</p> </td><td> <p>12.16878<sup>*</sup></p> </td><td> <p>2.85023</p> </td><td> <p>.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Electrical</p> </td><td> <p>.92769</p> </td><td> <p>2.67947</p> </td><td> <p>.936</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>In above table 4(a),
post hoc (Tukey) results were indicated that a mean difference among employees’
perceptions belongs to Civil technology was significantly different as compared
to the employees’ of  Electrical and
Mechanical technology at p?0.05 level of significance.</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 5.</bold> Qualification wise Comparison of Employees’ Perceptions
about Effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program</p> <table-wrap id="table6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><title>Table 6</title></caption><table><thead><tr><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Sum
   of Square</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Mean
   Square</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Curriculum</p> </td><td> <p>34.215</p> <p>1585.603</p> <p>1619.818</p> </td><td> <p>8.554</p> <p>11.490</p> </td><td> <p>4</p> <p>138</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>0.744</p> </td><td> <p>0.563</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Physical
  Facilities at Job Place</p> </td><td> <p>720.872</p> <p>6788.834</p> <p>7509.706</p> </td><td> <p>180.218</p> <p>49.194</p> </td><td> <p>4</p> <p>138</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>3.663</p> </td><td> <p>0.007</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Administrative
  Facilities</p> </td><td> <p>391.638</p> <p>5170.110</p> <p>5561.748</p> </td><td> <p>97.910</p> <p>37.465</p> </td><td> <p>4</p> <p>138</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>2.613</p> </td><td> <p>0.038</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Assessment
  and Evaluation</p> </td><td> <p>5.738</p> <p>492.878</p> <p>498.615</p> </td><td> <p>1.434</p> <p>3.572</p> </td><td> <p>4</p> <p>138</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>0.402</p> </td><td> <p>0.807</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Social
  Factors</p> </td><td> <p>36.608</p> <p>943.210</p> <p>979.818</p> </td><td> <p>9.152</p> <p>6.835</p> </td><td> <p>4</p> <p>138</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>1.339</p> </td><td> <p>0.259</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>In table 5, the
employees’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the DAE program based on five
factors at the workplace was compared by applying One-way ANOVA in terms of
their qualification.  Findings revealed
that significant differences between employees’ perceptions regarding physical
facilities and administrative facilities were found at p?0.05 level of
significance in terms of their qualification. On the other hand, employees have
no significant difference of perceptions regarding DAE curriculum, assessment
and evaluation system and effect of social factors in the organizations they
were working at p?0.05 level of significance in terms of their qualification.</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 6.</bold> Age-wise Comparison of Employees’ Perceptions about
Effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program</p> <table-wrap id="table7"><label>Table 7</label><caption><title>Table 7</title></caption><table><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sum
  of Square</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Mean
  Square</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </td><td> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Curriculum</p> </td><td> <p>21.989</p> <p>1597.830</p> <p>1619.818</p> </td><td> <p>4.398</p> <p>11.663</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>0.377</p> </td><td> <p>0.864</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Physical Facilities at Job Place</p> </td><td> <p>921.318</p> <p>6588.388</p> <p>7509.706</p> </td><td> <p>184.264</p> <p>48.090</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>3.832</p> </td><td> <p>0.003</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Administrative Facilities</p> </td><td> <p>289.681</p> <p>5272.067</p> <p>5561.748</p> </td><td> <p>57.936</p> <p>38.482</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>1.506</p> </td><td> <p>0.192</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Assessment and Evaluation</p> </td><td> <p>12.622</p> <p>485.993</p> <p>498.615</p> </td><td> <p>2.524</p> <p>3.547</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>0.712</p> </td><td> <p>0.616</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>Social Factors</p> </td><td> <p>80.231</p> <p>899.587</p> <p>979.818</p> </td><td> <p>16.046</p> <p>6.566</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>2.444</p> </td><td> <p>0.037</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>In table 6 the
employees’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the DAE program based on five
factors at the workplace was compared by applying One-way ANOVA in terms of
their age.  Findings revealed that a significant
difference between employees’ perceptions regarding physical facilities and
administrative facilities was found at a p?0.05 level of significance in terms
of their age. On the other hand, employees have no significant difference about
DAE curriculum, assessment and evaluation system and effect of social factors
in the organizations they were working at p?0.05 level of significance in terms
of their age.</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 6(a).</bold> AgeWise Comparison of Employees’ Perceptions about
Effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program (Post hoc Tukey,
HSD)</p> <table-wrap id="table8"><label>Table 8</label><caption><title>Table 8</title></caption><table><thead><tr><th valign="top"> <p><bold>(I) Age</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>(J) Age</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Mean Difference (I-J)</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Std. Error</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="5"> <p>20-25 years</p> </td><td> <p>26-30 years</p> </td><td> <p>8.22632</p> </td><td> <p>4.98693</p> </td><td> <p>.567</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>31-35 years</p> </td><td> <p>2.61667</p> </td><td> <p>5.28126</p> </td><td> <p>.996</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>36-40 years</p> </td><td> <p>-2.95714</p> </td><td> <p>5.03126</p> </td><td> <p>.992</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>41-45 years</p> </td><td> <p>5.75882</p> </td><td> <p>5.59193</p> </td><td> <p>.907</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>46-50 years</p> </td><td> <p>6.17368</p> </td><td> <p>5.48184</p> </td><td> <p>.870</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5"> <p>26-30 years</p> </td><td> <p>20-25 years</p> </td><td> <p>-8.22632</p> </td><td> <p>4.98693</p> </td><td> <p>.567</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>31-35 years</p> </td><td> <p>-5.60965</p> </td><td> <p>3.65850</p> </td><td> <p>.643</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>36-40 years</p> </td><td> <p>-11.18346<sup>*</sup></p> </td><td> <p>3.28730</p> </td><td> <p>.011</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>41-45 years</p> </td><td> <p>-2.46749</p> </td><td> <p>4.09420</p> </td><td> <p>.991</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>46-50 years</p> </td><td> <p>-2.05263</p> </td><td> <p>3.94251</p> </td><td> <p>.995</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5"> <p>31-35 years</p> </td><td> <p>20-25 years</p> </td><td> <p>-2.61667</p> </td><td> <p>5.28126</p> </td><td> <p>.996</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>26-30 years</p> </td><td> <p>5.60965</p> </td><td> <p>3.65850</p> </td><td> <p>.643</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>36-40 years</p> </td><td> <p>-5.57381</p> </td><td> <p>3.71869</p> </td><td> <p>.666</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>41-45 years</p> </td><td> <p>3.14216</p> </td><td> <p>4.44801</p> </td><td> <p>.981</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>46-50 years</p> </td><td> <p>3.55702</p> </td><td> <p>4.30880</p> </td><td> <p>.962</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5"> <p>36-40 years</p> </td><td> <p>20-25 years</p> </td><td> <p>2.95714</p> </td><td> <p>5.03126</p> </td><td> <p>.992</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>26-30 years</p> </td><td> <p>11.18346<sup>*</sup></p> </td><td> <p>3.28730</p> </td><td> <p>.011</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>31-35 years</p> </td><td> <p>5.57381</p> </td><td> <p>3.71869</p> </td><td> <p>.666</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>41-45 years</p> </td><td> <p>8.71597</p> </td><td> <p>4.14808</p> </td><td> <p>.293</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>46-50 years</p> </td><td> <p>9.13083</p> </td><td> <p>3.99844</p> </td><td> <p>.208</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5"> <p>41-45 years</p> </td><td> <p>20-25 years</p> </td><td> <p>-5.75882</p> </td><td> <p>5.59193</p> </td><td> <p>.907</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>26-30 years</p> </td><td> <p>2.46749</p> </td><td> <p>4.09420</p> </td><td> <p>.991</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>31-35 years</p> </td><td> <p>-3.14216</p> </td><td> <p>4.44801</p> </td><td> <p>.981</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>36-40 years</p> </td><td> <p>-8.71597</p> </td><td> <p>4.14808</p> </td><td> <p>.293</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>46-50 years</p> </td><td> <p>.41486</p> </td><td> <p>4.68440</p> </td><td> <p>1.000</p> </td></tr><tr><td rowspan="5"> <p>46-50 years</p> </td><td> <p>20-25 years</p> </td><td> <p>-6.17368</p> </td><td> <p>5.48184</p> </td><td> <p>.870</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>26-30 years</p> </td><td> <p>2.05263</p> </td><td> <p>3.94251</p> </td><td> <p>.995</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>31-35 years</p> </td><td> <p>-3.55702</p> </td><td> <p>4.30880</p> </td><td> <p>.962</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>36-40 years</p> </td><td> <p>-9.13083</p> </td><td> <p>3.99844</p> </td><td> <p>.208</p> </td></tr><tr><td> <p>41-45 years</p> </td><td> <p>-.41486</p> </td><td> <p>4.68440</p> </td><td> <p>1.000</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>  <p><break/></p> <p>In above table 6(a),
post hoc (Tukey) results were indicated that mean differences among employees’
perceptions having age group 26-30 years were significantly different with the
employees having age group of 36-40 years at p?0.05 level of significance in
terms of their age.</p> <p><break/></p>  <p><bold>Table 7.</bold> Experience Wise Comparison of Employees’ Perceptions about
Effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program</p> <table-wrap id="table9"><label>Table 9</label><caption><title>Table 9</title></caption><table><thead><tr><th valign="top"> <p><bold>Variables</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Sum
   of Square</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Mean
   Square</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>df</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>F</bold></p> </th><th> <p><bold>Sig.</bold></p> </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Curriculum</p> </td><td> <p>61.933</p> <p>1557.885</p> <p>1619.818</p> </td><td> <p>12.387</p> <p>11.371</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>1.089</p> </td><td> <p>0.369</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Physical
  Facilities at Job Place</p> </td><td> <p>535.234</p> <p>6974.472</p> <p>7509.706</p> </td><td> <p>107.047</p> <p>50.909</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>2.103</p> </td><td> <p>0.069</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Administrative
  Facilities</p> </td><td> <p>531.138</p> <p>5030.611</p> <p>5561.748</p> </td><td> <p>106.228</p> <p>36.720</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>2.893</p> </td><td> <p>0.016</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Assessment
  and Evaluation</p> </td><td> <p>25.537</p> <p>473.078</p> <p>498.615</p> </td><td> <p>5.107</p> <p>3.453</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>1.479</p> </td><td> <p>0.201</p> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top"> <p>Social
  Factors</p> </td><td> <p>81.091</p> <p>898.727</p> <p>979.818</p> </td><td> <p>16.218</p> <p>6.560</p> </td><td> <p>5</p> <p>137</p> <p>142</p> </td><td> <p>2.472</p> </td><td> <p>0.035</p> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <p><break/></p><p>In above table 7,
the employees’ perceptions about the effectiveness of the DAE program based on
five factors at the workplace were compared by applying One-way ANOVA in terms
of their experience. Findings revealed that a significant difference between
employees’ perceptions regarding administrative facilities and social factors
was found at a p?0.05 level of significance in terms of their experience. On
the other hand, employees have no significant difference about DAE curriculum,
physical facilities, assessment and evaluation system and effect of social
factors in the organizations they were working at p?0.05 level of significance
in terms of their experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<p>The study was aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE) Program based on five factors (DAE curriculum, physical facilities, administrative facilities, assessment and evaluation system and social factors). Findings of the study revealed that employees at the workplace were satisfied with the curriculum taught to DAE graduates, where the curriculum is enough to make them knowledgeable and skill-oriented. Employees at the workplace also agreed that they were provided with facilities, for example, infrastructure, laboratories, transportation, fir-fighting, residence, and equipped workshops at the workplace. On the other hand, employees were satisfied regarding administrative facilities (resource utilization, technology support, and provision of skilled employers). Employees, on the other hand, were not much satisfied with their assessment and evaluation system included compensations, promotions, opportunities for foreign training, and a professional development system at the workplace. It is further concluded that employees were not very satisfied with the feedback and assessment system at the workplace. Developing countries, including Pakistan, are relying on the development of skilled workers to contribute to their economy (Tilak, 2003). Pakistan needs to prepare a class of workers who are high-level skilled and proficient in modern technology (Amjad, Haque, &amp; Colclough, 2005). Findings further indicated that employees belong to rural and urban areas have significant differences in perceptions regarding the effectiveness of Diploma of Associate Engineers (DAE), including curriculum, physical facilities, administrative facilities, and social factors as compared to assessment and evaluation systems in organizations. Moreover, employees working in public and private sectors have differences of perceptions regarding DAE curriculum, physical facilities, administrative facilities and social factors as compared to the assessment system at the job place. It was further indicated that civil, mechanical and electrical engineers have differences of perceptions regarding physical facilities, administrative facilities, and social factors affecting them at the workplace. However, they were not satisfied with the assessment and evaluation system at the workplace. It was further revealed that age-wise differences of opinion were found among employees regarding physical facilities and social factors, but employees have no significant difference about DAE curriculum, assessment and evaluation system and effect of social factors in the organizations they were working in terms of their age. Employees’ perceptions regarding their experience were found to be significant about administrative facilities and social factors as compared to DAE curriculum, assessment and evaluation system and effect of social factors in the organizations they were working. It was found in the literature that the employability of TVET graduates, employers in Nigeria believed that TVET graduates are not well prepared to enter the competitive workplace and do not possess technical skills in their areas of specialization (Bappah &amp; Medugu, 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
<p>It is concluded that employees were satisfied with the DAE curriculum, physical facilities, and administrative facilities at their workplace. On the other hand, employees were not very satisfied with their assessment and evaluation systems and social factors affecting their workplaces. A significant mean difference was found in employees’ perceptions regarding the effectiveness of (DAE) program regarding their locale, job type, and trade. Employees’ perceptions regarding their experience were found to be significant about administrative facilities and social factors as compared to DAE curriculum, assessment and evaluation system and effect of social factors in the organizations they were working. It was further revealed that age-wise differences of opinion were found among employees regarding physical facilities and social factors, but employees have no significant difference about DAE curriculum, assessment and evaluation system and effect of social factors in the organizations they were working in terms of their age.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-7">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
<p>It is concluded that employees were satisfied with the DAE curriculum, physical facilities, and administrative facilities at their workplace. On the other hand, employees were not very satisfied with their assessment and evaluation systems and social factors affecting their workplaces. A significant mean difference was found in employees’ perceptions regarding the effectiveness of (DAE) program regarding their locale, job type, and trade. Employees’ perceptions regarding their experience were found to be significant about administrative facilities and social factors as compared to DAE curriculum, assessment and evaluation system and effect of social factors in the organizations they were working. It was further revealed that age-wise differences of opinion were found among employees regarding physical facilities and social factors, but employees have no significant difference about DAE curriculum, assessment and evaluation system and effect of social factors in the organizations they were working in terms of their age.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-8">
  <title>Recommendations</title>
<p>Following are the recommendations of the study.</p><p>1.	Curriculum planners and implementers should enhance skill development strategies.</p><p>2.	It is recommended to hire teaching faculty who have knowledge and skills to train DAE graduates according to the industry demand.</p><p>3.	Laboratories should be well equipped with apparatus to develop skills among DAE graduates.</p><p>4.	It is recommended to provide On Job Training (OJT) to DAE graduates to improve the organization’s standard.</p><p>5.	It is recommended that government may create job opportunities and ensure job securities for DAE graduates in Punjab.</p><p>6.	It is further recommended that employees’ promotion criteria should be defined for DAE graduates at the workplace.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group content-type="conflict-of-interest">
  <title>Conflict of Interest</title>
  <fn fn-type="conflict">
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="ethics-statement">
  <title>Ethics Statement</title>
  <fn fn-type="ethics">
<p>This study did not require formal ethics approval.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group content-type="data-availability">
  <title>Data Availability</title>
  <fn fn-type="data-availability-statement">
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article.</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
<app-group>
  <app id="app-suppl">
    <title>Supplementary Materials</title>
<supplementary-material id="suppl-pdf" content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://gesrjournal.com/pdf/gesr/3MhtTUJxQx.pdf">
  <label>PDF</label>
  <caption>
    <title>Full Text PDF</title>
  </caption>
</supplementary-material>
  </app>
</app-group>
<ref-list>
  <title>References</title>
<ref id="Aina">
  <label>1</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Aina, O</person-group>
    <year>2006</year>
    <article-title>. Technical and Vocational Education (TVE) in Nigeria: The way forward</article-title>
    <source>Paper presented at the ETF zonal sensitization workshops on the importance of technical and vocational education in Nigeria, Port Harcourt</source>
    <page-range>aper</page-range>
    Aina, O. (2006). Technical and Vocational Education (TVE) in Nigeria: The way forward. Paper presented at the ETF zonal sensitization workshops on the importance of technical and vocational education in Nigeria, Port Harcourt.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Giroux">
  <label>2</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Giroux, H</person-group>
    <year>1991</year>
    <article-title>. Series introduction: Reading work education as the practice theory</article-title>
    <source>In R. I simon, D. Dippoo, &amp; A. Schenk (Eds.), Learning Work: A Critical Pedagogy of Work Education. New York: Bergin &amp; Ganvey</source>
    <page-range>ractice</page-range>
    Giroux, H. (1991). Series introduction: Reading work education as the practice theory. In R. I simon, D. Dippoo, &amp; A. Schenk (Eds.), Learning Work: A Critical Pedagogy of Work Education. New York: Bergin &amp; Ganvey.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Herr">
  <label>3</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Herr, E. L</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. Trends in the History of Vocational Guidance</article-title>
    <source>The Career Development Quarterly</source>
    <volume>61</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>277</fpage>
    <lpage>282</lpage>
    Herr, E. L. (2013). Trends in the History of Vocational Guidance. The Career Development Quarterly, 61(3), 277-282.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00056.x</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00056.x">10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00056.x</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Manifred">
  <label>4</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Manifred, T., &amp; Jennifer, W</person-group>
    <year>2004</year>
    <article-title>. Vocational education and training: Key to the future</article-title>
    <source>Greece: Colibri Ltd</source>
    Manifred, T., &amp; Jennifer, W. (2004). Vocational education and training: Key to the future. Greece: Colibri Ltd.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Mustapha">
  <label>5</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Mustapha, R. B., &amp; Greeman, J. B</person-group>
    <year>2002</year>
    <article-title>. The role of vocational education in economic development of Malaysia: Educationists and employers Perspectives</article-title>
    <source>Journal of Industrial Teacher Education</source>
    <volume>39</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <fpage>58</fpage>
    <lpage>73</lpage>
    Mustapha, R. B., &amp; Greeman, J. B. (2002). The role of vocational education in economic development of Malaysia: Educationists and employers Perspectives. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(2), 58-73.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Okolocha">
  <label>6</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Okolocha, C. C</person-group>
    <year>2006</year>
    <article-title>. Vocational technical education in Nigeria: Challenges and the way forward</article-title>
    <source>Unizik Orient Journal of Education</source>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <fpage>180</fpage>
    <lpage>189</lpage>
    Okolocha, C. C. (2006). Vocational technical education in Nigeria: Challenges and the way forward. Unizik Orient Journal of Education, 2(1), 180-189.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Olaitan">
  <label>7</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Olaitan, S. O</person-group>
    <year>1993</year>
    <article-title>. Essential considerations for an effective vocational-technical education development in Nigeria</article-title>
    <source>Paper presented at 8th Annual conference of Nigerian vocational association at university of Uyo, Akwa Ibom State</source>
    <page-range>aper</page-range>
    Olaitan, S. O. (1993). Essential considerations for an effective vocational-technical education development in Nigeria. Paper presented at 8th Annual conference of Nigerian vocational association at university of Uyo, Akwa Ibom State.
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="Sadiq">
  <label>8</label>
  <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
    <person-group person-group-type="author">Sadiq, A</person-group>
    <year>2013</year>
    <article-title>. Employers&apos; Perception of the Role of Technical Vocational Education and Training in Sustainable Development in Nigeria</article-title>
    <source>IOSR Journal of Research &amp; Method in Education (IOSRJRME)</source>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <fpage>01</fpage>
    <lpage>05</lpage>
    Sadiq, A. (2013). Employers&apos; Perception of the Role of Technical Vocational Education and Training in Sustainable Development in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research &amp; Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 2(3), 01-05.
    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9790/7388-0230105</pub-id>
    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0230105">10.9790/7388-0230105</ext-link>
  </mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>